Using voicemail is also direct and an effective means of communication. Even though the words were exactly the same as the email, the voice delivered a pleasant and professional message. As with the email example, I might not know the person but she sounded sincere and amiable. She was able to convey the same message without it sounding condescending or with any hint of irritability. It was easy to perceive that she needed the information but was not angry or overly pushy. The challenge with the voicemail is similar to the email since it is impossible to know if the recipient actually listened and/or understood the message.
The face to face message was very effective. The words were exactly the same as the two previous forms of communication but this was form was probably the most complete in terms of delivering the full intent of the message. The person who gave the message stood in a non-threatening place, smiled, used very few hand gestures and kept the tone of her voice in a friendly and professional manner. She also maintained good eye contact with the person she was talking to as she delivered her message. In this form of communication the sender can guarantee that the recipient received the message and get immediate feedback from the recipient. The only con to this form is that it does not have an immediate way of documenting the exchange. The sender must document the conversation in some form at a later time.
When working with a team it is important to use the most effective means of communication for each team member. All three are appropriate and useful, but not always the best for an individual person. People vary in their manner of receiving a message so it is important to find out either by asking the team member or even through trial and error which is the most effective. At times someone may need to use multiple forms of communication to get the message delivered. However in all cases, documenting the exchanges is critical and key to keeping everyone on the same page and properly informed.
Reference
Multimedia Program: "The Art of Effective Communication"
HI Dean,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed your post and the separating pictures. In you last paragraph you stated "When working with a team it is important to use the most effective means of communication for each team member. All three are appropriate and useful, but not always the best for an individual person." I must agree and I would encourage the multiple forms of delivery at all times. Using email as documentation tracking but using both forms of auditory communication, switching back and forth. This way you are hitting on all forms of communication and doing that you can "monitor for results" (2010)as Dr. Stolovich suggests.
John
Reference
Video Program: “Project Management Concerns: Communication Strategies and Organizational Culture” Walden University, 2010
Hi Dean,
ReplyDeleteThank you for your post. I found your statement concerning the face to face communication very interesting. "In this form of communication the sender can guarantee that the recipient received the message and get immediate feedback from the recipient." I had not thought of that point when reviewing the three scenarios. Immediate feedback and visual confirmation of how the request is received would be valuable. Additionally, Portny et al. (2008) suggest written communications do not “Allow the intended audience to ask questions to clarify the content, meaning and implications of message being sent” (p.358).
However, I felt that reminding a coworker of a request over a cube wall when that person was busy with meetings all day would not be effective because the request could be lost amongst the business of the day. Both project managers and team members should attempt to use the right form of communication for the subject matter and the recipient. Important information needs to be given or followed up with in writing otherwise it will be forgotten or overlooked. In this case the problem with the email was that it was poorly written. A well written email reminder with a follow up face to face confirmation later in the day that the email was received might have been best in this situation. Portny et al. (2008) asserts “Confirm in writing the important information that was shared in informal discussions” (p.357).
Great post as always!
Anita
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Dean,
ReplyDeleteCommunication is the biggest part of most people’s work day. Effective communication can carry projects to a successful ending while ineffective communication is just the opposite and can lead to a project failure. As the Project Manager (PM), it is Jane’s responsibility to hold her team members accountable and to create a sense of urgency. Her part is to communicate throughout the project describing any actions that people should take. Each of these methods can be useful. It is up to the PM to use the right method with the right persons. Face-to-face or verbal communication is best when explaining complex process, technical issue, or the project plan with a person or team. Email is convenient and fast. It is useful and efficient for providing quick answers, asking simple questions, or providing simple updates or information. I do not think Email should be used to have a dialog, debate, or to solve complex issues.
Reference:
Portny, S., Mantel, S., Meredith, J., Shafer, S., Sutton, M., & Kramer, B. (2008). Project Management: Planning, scheduling and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.